Jiah Khan Case: Netizens TR0LL Sooraj Pancholi For Doing THIS As He Visits SiddhiVinayak Temple (Watch Video)
In the Jiah Khan Suicide Case, the court granted Sooraj Pancholi relief. He was found not guilty of aiding and abetting suicide. For the past ten years, the young actor has been embroiled in a legal battle. According to Judge AS Sayyad, there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate that he was truly accountable for the same.
He was arrested in 2013 and spent 22 days in Byculla's Arthur Road Jail. Jiah Khan was murdered, according to the mother of the late actress Rabia Khan. She stated that she had gathered all of the evidence and delivered it to the courts. Sooraj Pancholi was spotted outside the Siddhi Vinayak temple today. But the actor is getting trolled now after a video from his visit went viral.
Some internet users have pointed out that he did not wash his hands after taking off his shoes. With dirty hands, he handled the flowers, God's photo, and offerings. It is, as we all know, considered unclean, and people always wash their hands before entering the temple.
A user commented on the video saying, “You are insulting the Hindu religion, first, you touch your shoes, then you touch the back of God, don't do all this show-off.” Another wrote, “Yar ye kya hai hands of shoes get touched to direct Prasad n photo, this is wrong, be respectful to your God please” “What nonsense Pehle joote side rakhte ho phir usi hath se bhagwan ko touch, aise respect ka kya fyeda”
Watch Video:
Recently, in an interview, the actor acknowledged that he is still coming to grips with the fact that he is no longer required to appear in court and that everything has come to an end. He admits to spending his entire twenties in court. Sooraj maintains that he is still absorbing the fact that he is no longer imprisoned.
Sooraj argues that the mother is only looking for someone else to blame. He argues that in order for her to be at peace, she needs someone to blame. Jiah had been providing for her family since she was sixteen. He alleges that because he was her lover, only his side of the story was taken into account in the case.
